General claims are different from particular claims. In this question, a general claim about the scientific understanding of personality is used to support a particular claim that science can’t disprove astrology. Statement 1 supports the main conclusion.Ī claim ➞ leads to intermediate conclusion ➞ which supports a final conclusion It supports statement one, which is an intermediate conclusion. Therefore the house is uncomfortably warm (main conclusion).Here’s an argument that uses an intermediate conclusion: Intermediate conclusions are statements supported by evidence and used to support the main conclusion. REASONING: Science doesn’t have a good definition of personality types, so it can’t disprove a correlation between personality types and anything else.ĪNALYSIS: This question hinges on a technical understanding of argument structure. QUESTION TEXT: Astrologer: Although some scientists have claimed that…ĬONCLUSION: It is unjustified to say that science has proven there is no correlation between astrological signs and personality types.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |